A video comparison of the recording process in Jmeter versus OctoPerf jmeter , design , recording https://octoperf.com/blog/2017/03/02/jmeter-vs-octoperf/ OctoPerf ZI Les Paluds, 276 Avenue du Douard, 13400 Aubagne, France +334 42 84 12 59 contact@octoperf.com Load Testing 243 2021-01-04

JMeter vs OctoPerf

OctoPerf is JMeter on steroids!
Schedule a Demo

Today’s blog will be a short video to demonstrate how quick the recording process is with OctoPerf when compared to JMeter. We always say that OctoPerf makes JMeter easier from the design to the test results, this video will show you how the recording process can be done twice as fast with OctoPerf.

And that is not counting how we cut the complexity of the recording process to a few clicks compared to all you have to do with JMeter.

With OctoPerf:

  • From your browser press F12 and activate persistent log
  • Navigate
  • Export as HAR file
  • Connect to OctoPerf and import the HAR file

With JMeter:

  • Create new test plan
  • Create new thread group
  • Create new HTTP request defaults
  • Fill server name
  • Create recording controller
  • Create new test script recorder
  • Configure pattern to include
  • Add result tree listener
  • Start recording
  • Configure JMeter proxy settings in your browser
  • Navigate

Watch the video on here:

JMeter vs OctoPerf
JMeter vs OctoPerf

Feel free to comment under the video to share your impressions!

And if you already recorded your scenario in JMeter, note that you can switch to OctoPerf in a few clicks by importing your JMX file. This way you can get started with OctoPerf step by step and save a lot of time today because there is no migration effort.

And keep in mind that OctoPerf helps you save time at many other levels and we’re always glad to demonstrate, just drop us a message on contact@octoperf.com.

JMeter vs OctoPerf
Want to become a super load tester?
OctoPerf Superman