Pay Less and Launch More VUs with OctoPerf

Functionally identical and much more flexible.

Book a Demo

With OctoPerf, it's the VUs that take off, not the price.

VUs

Price

Vus

Read Why Pearson Switched from LoadRunner to OctoPerf.

Find out

Features	OctoPerf vs. LoadRunner
Pricing	Unlimited Pricing based on concurrent users	At least 3x more expensive
Concurrent Testing	Yes - Unlimited	Limited - Optional
Install	Browser Based	Heavy Client
Scripting	Codeless	Code
JMeter™ Import	100% Compatible	Limited
Migration Off the Tool	AI-assisted: survey your scripts, then import them	Rewrite from scratch
Reversibility	Exportable to JMeter™	Full Vendor Lock-in
	Ask for a Quote

The Top LoadRunner Alternative

OctoPerf offers all testers a user-friendly continuous testing platform by combining advanced features with an unparalleled value-based pricing model.

As the top alternative to LoadRunner, OctoPerf stands out with its codeless scripting studio and strong reporting engine to make the switch fast and seamless. Quit overpaying for a tool that has stopped innovating and supporting its customer base and discover OctoPerf’s powerful yet cost-effective testing platform.

Schedule a Demo

New in OctoPerf 17

Migrate Your VuGen Scripts With an AI Agent

Moving off LoadRunner has always had the same problem: you find out what does not convert after committing to the migration. OctoPerf ships a LoadRunner migration playbook for AI agents, and its first job is not an import - it is a survey.

Survey first, read-only. A portability verdict, an inventory of calls, pages, transactions and parameters, a breakdown per script - and nothing written to your project.
Then import. Transactions become named containers, web_reg_find becomes assertions, .prm parameters become variables with their .dat files uploaded, think times and recorded cookies come across.
Work one list, not the tree. Whatever the C left behind is reported with its script, action and line number, and marked in the virtual user right where the work is.
Validate before scaling. Replay the migrated virtual user with a single concurrent user on a real load generator, as often as you need, before you spend a test hour at scale.

Read the Walkthrough See How It Works

"Here is a LoadRunner script folder. Before importing anything, tell me whether it is worth migrating."

"portability": "ASSISTED",
"protocols": [
  { "protocol": "QTWeb", "convertible": true }
],
"inventory": {
  "calls": 100, "pages": 8,
  "transactions": 8, "actions": 3,
  "extractors": 3, "assertions": 3,
  "parameters": 3, "dataFiles": 2,
  "unsupportedCalls": 3
}

Three verdicts: MECHANICAL runs nearly as it is, ASSISTED imports then works the list, MOSTLY_MANUAL means the C outweighs the requests - and the honest answer is to re-record. Run the survey on your worst script, not your best.